Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¿­¼øȯÀÌ »ó¾ÆÁúÁ¢ÂøÁ¦Ã³¸® ÈÄ ¹Ì¼¼´©Ãâ¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸

The study of the effect of thermocycling on microleakage within various dentin bonding agents

À¯½ÂÈÆ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
À¯½ÂÈÆ ( Yoo Seung-Hoon ) - ´Ü±¹´ëÇб³

Abstract

5¼¼´ë »ó¾ÆÁú Á¢ÂøÁ¦ÀÎ Adper Single bond 2.0 (3M-ESPE, USA), 6¼¼´ë »ó¾ÆÁú Á¢ÂøÁ¦ÀÎ Prompt L-pop (3M-ESPE, USA), AdheSE (Ivoclar Vivadent, Liechtenstein) ¸¦ °¢ »ó¾ÆÁú Á¢ÂøÁ¦´ç 30°³ÀÇ °ÇÀüÇÑ ¼Ò±¸Ä¡ ¹× ´ë±¸Ä¡¸¦ ¼±Á¤ÇÏ¿© Çù¸é°ú ¼³¸é¿¡ 5±Þ¿Íµ¿À» Çü¼ºÇÏ°í º¹ÇÕ·¹ÁøÀ» Àû¿ëÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÀÌÁß Àý¹ÝÀº ¿­¼øȯÀ» ½ÃÇàÇÏÁö ¾Ê°í ³ª¸ÓÁö Àý¹ÝÀº ¿­¼øȯÀ» ½ÃÇàÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÀÌÈÄ ¸ÞÆ¿·» ºí·ç¸¦ ħÅõ½ÃÄÑ ½Ã¾àÀÇ Ä§Åõ Á¤µµ¸¦ ÃøÁ¤ÇÑ ÈÄ Åë°èºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¿­¼øȯÀ» ½ÃÇàÇÏÁö ¾ÊÀº ±º°ú ¿­¼øȯÀ» ½ÃÇàÇÑ ±ºÀ» ÅëƲ¾î ¿­¼øȯÀ» ½ÃÇàÇÏÁö ¾ÊÀº »ó¾ÆÁú ±º¿¡¼­¸¸ Single Bond 2.0ÀÇ ¹Ì¼¼´©ÃâÀÇ ¾çÀÌ Prompt L-Pop°ú AdheSE¿¡ ºñÇÏ¿© ³ô¾Ò°í (p <.05) ³ª¸ÓÁö ±º¿¡¼­´Â ¸ðµÎ Single Bond 2.0ÀÇ ¹Ì¼¼´©ÃâÀÇ ¾çÀÌ Àû¾ú´Ù. (p <.05) ¿­¼øȯ ÀÌÈÄ¿¡ ¹Ì¼¼´©ÃâÀÇ ¾çÀÌ ´Ã¾î³­ ±ºÀº Prompt L-Pop°ú AdheSEÀÇ »ó¾ÆÁú ±ºÀ̾ú´Ù.

Three groups of dentin bonding agents (5th generation Single Bond 2.0 and two 6the generation Prompt L-Pop, AdheSE) applied to class V cavities (upper portion with enamel margin and lower portion with dentin margin) prepared at buccal and lingual portion of premolars and molars. Each groups consist of 30 teeth. Devide into two groups, one without thermocycling and the other thermocycled. After then, infiltrate methylene blue into the gap between restoration and tooth. Within non-thermocycled groups, Single Bond 2.0 group shows lesser leakage at enamel margin than other two bonding agents (p <.05) but shows more leakage at dentin margin than other two bonding agents. (p <.05) Within thermocycled groups, Single Bond 2.0 group shows lesser leakage at both enamel and dentin margins. (p <.05)

Å°¿öµå

¹Ì¼¼´©Ãâ;¿­¼øȯ
Microleakage;Thermocycling

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI